[1] Legal Fees

 

Russ, August & Kabat provides legal services to the Company with respect to its patent litigation filed in May 2017 against Facebook, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York relating to several patents within the Company’s Mirror Worlds Patent Portfolio (see Note I[4] hereof). The terms of the Company’s agreement with Russ, August & Kabat provide for cash payments on a monthly basis subject to a cap plus a contingency fee ranging between 15% and 24% of the net recovery (after deduction of expenses) depending on the stage of the proceeding in which the result (settlement or judgment) is achieved. The Company is responsible for all of the expenses incurred with respect to this litigation.

 

Russ, August & Kabat also provides legal services to the Company with respect to its pending patent litigations filed in April 2014 and December 2014 against Google Inc. and YouTube, LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York relating to certain patents within the Company’s Cox Patent Portfolio (see Note I[3] hereof). The terms of the Company’s agreement with Russ, August & Kabat provide for legal fees on a full contingency basis ranging from 15% to 30% of the net recovery (after deduction of expenses) depending on the stage of the proceeding in which the result (settlement or judgment) is achieved. The Company is responsible for all of the expenses incurred with respect to this litigation.

 

Dovel & Luner, LLP provides legal services to the Company with respect to its patent litigation filed in September 2011 against sixteen (16) data networking equipment manufacturers in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler (see Note I[1] hereof). The terms of the Company’s agreement with Dovel & Luner LLP essentially provide for legal fees on a full contingency basis ranging from 12.5% to 35% (with certain exceptions) of the net recovery (after deduction for expenses) depending on the stage of the preceding in which a result (settlement or judgment) is achieved. For the three months ended June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019, the Company incurred aggregate contingent legal fees to Dovel & Luner, LLP with respect to the litigation of $18,000 and $136,000, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019, the Company incurred contingent legal fees to Dovel & Luner, LLP with respect to the litigation of $37,000 and $244,000, respectively. As of June 30, 2020 and for the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company included in accrued expenses aggregate contingent legal fees to Dovel & Luner, LLP with respect to the litigation of $36,000 and $485,000, respectively. The Company is responsible for a certain portion of the expenses incurred with respect to the litigation.

 

Dovel & Luner, LLP also provided legal services to the Company with respect to the litigation settled in July 2010 against Cisco and several other major data networking equipment manufacturers (see Note I[2] hereof). The terms of the Company’s agreement with Dovel & Luner, LLP with respect to this litigation provided for legal fees of a maximum aggregate cash payment of $1.5 million plus a contingency fee of 24% (based on the settlement being achieved at the trial stage). With respect to royalty payments received from Cisco in accordance with the Company’s settlement and license agreement with Cisco, the Company has an obligation to pay Dovel & Luner, LLP (including local counsel) 24% of such royalties received. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019, the Company did not incur any contingent legal fees to Dovel & Luner, LLP with respect to the litigation. 

 

[2] Patent Acquisitions

 

In connection with the Company’s acquisition of its Cox Patent Portfolio, the Company is obligated to pay Dr. Cox 12.5% of the net proceeds (after deduction of expenses) generated by the Company from licensing, sale or enforcement of the patent portfolio.

 

As part of the acquisition of the Mirror Worlds Patent Portfolio, the Company also entered into an agreement with Recognition Interface, LLC (“Recognition”) pursuant to which Recognition received from the Company an interest in the net proceeds realized from the monetization of the Mirror Worlds Patent Portfolio, as follows: (i) 10% of the first $125 million of net proceeds; (ii) 15% of the next $125 million of net proceeds; and (iii) 20% of any portion of the net proceeds in excess of $250 million. Since entering into the agreement with Recognition in May 2013, the Company has paid Recognition an aggregate of $3,127,000 with respect to such net proceeds interest related to the Mirror Worlds Patent Portfolio. No such payments were made by the Company to Recognition during the three months ended June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019.

 

In connection with the Company’s acquisition of its M2M/IoT Patent Portfolio, the Company is obligated to pay M2M 14% of the first $100 million of net proceeds (after deduction of expenses) and 5% of net proceeds greater than $100 million from Monetization Activities (as defined) related to the patent portfolio. In addition, M2M will be entitled to receive from the Company $250,000 of additional consideration upon the occurrence of certain future events related to the patent portfolio.

  

[3] Lease Agreements

 

The Company leases its principal office in New York City at a monthly base rate of approximately $3,900 which lease expired on May 31, 2020 and is currently occupied on a month-to-month basis. The Company also leases office space in New Canaan, Connecticut (which was to expire on September 30, 2019) at a base rent (inclusive of utilities) of $7,850 per month. The Connecticut lease was extended (in September 2019) through March 31, 2020 and thereafter on a month-to-month basis.

 

Under ASC 842 operating lease expense is generally recognized evenly over the term of the lease. Leases with an initial term of twelve months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet. For lease arrangements entered into or reassessed after the adoption of ASC 842, the Company combines the lease and non-lease components in determining the right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and related lease obligation.

 

Activity related to the Company’s operating leases was as follows:

 

		Three Months Ended June 30, 2020				Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
Operating lease expense		$	8,000			$	41,000
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease obligations		$	8,000			$	41,000

 

 

The Company’s operating lease agreements generally do not provide an implicit borrowing rate; therefore, an internal incremental borrowing rate was determined based on information available for purposes of determining the present value of lease payments. The Company has used an incremental borrowing rate of 5.5% for all recognized operating lease right-of use assets as of December 31, 2019. ROU lease assets and related lease obligations for the Company’s operating leases were recorded in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as follows:

 

		As of				As of
		June 30, 2020				December 31, 2019
Operating lease right-of-use assets		$	—			$	41,000
Operating lease obligations – current		$	—			$	41,000
Total lease obligations		$	—			$	41,000
Weighted average remaining lease term (in months)			—				4 months
Weighted average discount rate			—				5.5%

 

As of June 30, 2020, there were no future lease payments included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as all of the Company's leases are now on a month-to-month basis. In accordance with ASC 842 and the Company's policy, the Company does not recognize an operating lease right-of-use asset and associated lease obligation for leases with an initial term of less than 12 months.